Defining Boundaries of Due Process in Blockchain Arbitration

Authors

Cemre Ç. Kadıoğlu Kumtepe
CyberArb
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9573-727X

Synopsis

Cemre delves into the
wider concept of blockchain arbitration and further clarifies the distinction between traditional off-chain arbitration for blockchain disputes and innovative blockchain dispute resolution mechanisms. In her chapter, another highly relevant question comes to the fore, namely whether and to what extent blockchain dispute resolution mechanisms, despite being oftentimes labelled as ‘arbitration’, deviate from traditional arbitration practices and established notions of due process. A central focus of this chapter lies in assessing the impact of blockchain arbitration mechanisms on enforceability. Cemre also extensively delves into the critical question of how due process influences enforceability, particularly in scenarios where the automatic execution of awards is coupled with party anonymity. She further explores the extent to which due process remains or should remain a pivotal consideration and questions whether automatic execution, without adherence to due process norms, can truly align with current justice standards.

Author Biography

Cemre Ç. Kadıoğlu Kumtepe, CyberArb

Cemre Ç. Kadıoğlu Kumtepe, PhD earned her LLB from Bilkent University and an LLM from Georgetown University. She has completed internships at various law firms, international organizations, and arbitration institutions, including ICSID and UNIDROIT. Cemre has practiced law in Istanbul, focusing on arbitration and civil law disputes. She holds a PhD from the University of Leicester on due process in blockchain dispute resolution. A member of both the New York Bar and Istanbul Bar, she is also an accredited mediator in Türkiye, specializing in commercial law disputes. Cemre serves on the board of CyberArb, an NGO dedicated to raising awareness of cybersecurity in international arbitration.

Downloads

Published

January 7, 2025

Series