Picking the Proper Technological Tool for Problem-Solving in Arbitration

Authors

Amy J. Schmitz
Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law

Synopsis

Amy J. Schmitz takes a step back and stresses the importance of a cautious approach to integrating technology into dispute resolution. She examines the rise of what she calls OArb, a term used to define arbitration that integrates the use of technology to facility the procedure, and explores its potential to improve access to justice. More specifically, she delves into the roles of AI, blockchain, and the metaverse in arbitration, discussing their respective benefits and challenges. With AI, she emphasizes the need for responsible implementation to address concerns like bias and privacy. Regarding blockchain, she explores its potential for transparent and decentralized dispute resolution systems. In the metaverse, she examines the possibilities of virtual arbitration hearings and the associated challenges. Amy advocates for a holistic approach to integrating technology in arbitration, emphasizing clear goals, stakeholder involvement, contextual understanding, appropriate structures, resource allocation, and accountability. She underscores the importance of technology complementing the core principles of arbitration rather than overshadowing them.

Author Biography

Amy J. Schmitz, Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law

Professor Amy J. Schmitz holds the John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Endowed Chair in Law at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. Professor Schmitz teaches courses in Arbitration, Contracts, Lawyering and Problem-Solving, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), Social Media and Conflict, AI, Data Analytics and the Law, International Arbitration, and Consumer Law. Prior to teaching, Schmitz clerked for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit and practiced law with large law firms in Seattle and Minneapolis, with a specialty in arbitration.  

Downloads

Published

January 7, 2025

Series